For lab operators · QA · Operations · IT · Procurement

Instrument health and compliance evidence — in one place your team controls.

Real-time instrument health monitoring, drift and threshold alerts, and traceable records your team can export for review — without replacing your validated equipment.

Whether you're managing compliance across analytical, QC, or environmental instruments, Trucision gives your operations team visibility to flag drift and anomalies early enough to schedule service or review, and documentation to support your response when auditors ask.

Supports your compliance with:

shield

21 CFR Part 11

EU Annex 11

Health Canada GUI-0050

shield

ISO 13485 / MDSAP

ISO/IEC 17025

GMP / GLP

shield

SOC 2 Type II

built for your whole team

AI that reads your lab systems and prepares audit-ready records.

Trucision's AI connects to your instruments, LIMS and quality systems with read-only access. It never changes your data. It gathers what your team needs, shows where every fact came from, and your people review and sign off. Here's what each team gets.

Blue shield icon with a checkmark symbol inside representing security or verification.

Quality & compliance teams

OOS investigations, audit trail gaps, and calibration failures — discovered by your auditor before your team.

Structured deviation context — timestamped, sensor-anchored, ready for quality system review

Traceable records for every instrument event — structured for your quality system export

Calibration drift alerts 48–72 hours before instruments cross a compliance threshold

Inspection-ready dashboards — give the auditor a URL, not a binder

Blue clock icon showing time at 3:00 on a light gray circular background.

Lab directors & operations leads

Unplanned downtime disrupts your sample queue. Reactive service means waiting days for a technician — dispatched without a confirmed diagnosis, into a problem you couldn’t describe precisely.
bullet point

48–72 hour advance notice when telemetry crosses your configured control limits — suspect drift or component stress, not a confirmed failure

bullet point

Shared telemetry package sent to your service team before dispatch — reducing repeat visits and guesswork

bullet point

Condition-based maintenance scheduling replaces fixed-interval guesswork

bullet point

Utilization data to justify instrument investment — and flag what’s being underused

Blue outlined server stack icon with two rectangular units and circular indicators on a white background.

IT & systems teams

Every instrument vendor has a different data format. your LIMS doesn’t know the instrument’s health state. and IoT devices create security exposure.

bullet point

MQTT and REST integration with LIS — no proprietary protocol lock-in

bullet point

Pre-built connectors for major LIMS, ELN, and cloud data platforms

bullet point

Works in air-gapped and restricted-network environments with on-device buffering

bullet point

Role-based access control, immutable audit logs, SOC 2 Type II

Blue thumbs-up like icon on white background.

Procurement & facility operations

Fixed service contracts don’t reflect actual usage. emergency calls are expensive. you have no data to negotiate from at renewal.

bullet point

Utilization and failure mode data to negotiate your next service contract from evidence, not estimates

bullet point

Your own visibility into service SLA performance — your operational data alongside your vendor’s reporting

bullet point

Condition-based service models replace flat annual fees

bullet point

Before/after service cost baseline — quantify ROI for leadership

key outcomes — for your lab

Operational evidence, not marketing claims.

bullet point

Early warning window

48–72 hrs

When telemetry crosses your configured thresholds — before a service action is typically required.

bullet point

Fewer reactive calls

25–40%

Condition-based monitoring allows labs to replace fixed-interval PM schedules.

bullet point

Remote pre-diagnosis rate

35%

Of instrument service cases begin remote diagnosis — reducing average time-to-dispatch and improving first-visit resolution rates.

bullet point

Time to first alert

14 days


From instrument connection to first instrument health alert — including telemetry schema setup and first model deployment.

your industry, your compliance framework

Multi-framework compliance, built for how your lab is actually regulated.

Select your industry to see how Trucision maps to your specific compliance environment, instrument types, and risk profile.

In GMP environments, a calibration gap isn't an inconvenience — it's a batch hold.

21 CFR Part 11 • 21 CFR Part 211 • EU GMP Annex 11 8 • ICH Q10 • ALCOA+

Built for your whole team

bullet point

HPLC and LC/MS systems

bullet point

Gas chromatographs (GC)

bullet point

UV/VIS and IR spectrophotometers

bullet point

Dissolution testers

bullet point

pH meters and karl Fischer titrators

bullet point

Environmental monitoring sensors (temperature, humidity, particle counts)

Biggest risks without monitoring

bullet point

Calibration drift found during batch release testing — batch hold, OOS investigation, potential rejection

bullet point

OOS result caused by instrument failure, not sample failure — investigation, regulatory reporting obligation

bullet point

Audit trail gaps in electronic records — FDA Form 483 observation, warning letter risk

bullet point

Fixed-interval calibration misses drift between cycles — instruments used out-of-spec without anyone knowing

Blue illustration of DNA model, microscope, medicine bottle, pills, test tubes, flask, and lab equipment.
outcome 1

Prevent batch holds

Drift and threshold alerts notify your QA team before instruments go out of spec — not after a failed QC sample identifies the problem.
outcome 2

Audit-ready electronic records

Every instrument event generates a traceable record: instrument ID, operator identity, timestamp, and environmental conditions — structured for your quality system export. Tamper-evident by design.
outcome 3

Prevent batch holds

When an OOS result occurs, trucision provides the instrument health history for the preceding 72 hours — the first thing an investigator needs and the thing that typically takes two days to reconstruct manually.

Deviation records and CAPA context don't have to be a six-week manual exercise after every nonconformance.

ISO 13485 • 21 CFR Part 820 • EU MDR/IVDR • ISO 9001

Built for your whole team

bullet point

Tensile and compression testers

bullet point

Coordinate measuring machines (CMM)

bullet point

Particle counters and cleanroom monitoring systems

bullet point

Hardness testers

bullet point

Surface roughness and optical profilometers

bullet point

Environmental monitoring sensors

Biggest risks without monitoring

bullet point

Instrument failure during a production run — DHR gap on all parts produced during that window

bullet point

IQ/OQ/PQ documentation manually maintained — recertification is expensive, slow, and error-prone

bullet point

Cleanroom environmental excursion not caught in real time — batch quarantine, corrective action, potential recall

Solid blue color background.

CAPA records created reactively with incomplete instrument context — investigation takes longer, findings are weaker

Illustration of scientific tools: DNA model, microscope, medicine bottle with pills, test tubes, flask, and reactor.

outcome 1

Prevent batch holds

Drift and threshold alerts notify your QA team before instruments go out of spec — not after a failed QC sample identifies the problem.

outcome 2

Audit-ready electronic records

Every instrument event generates a traceable record: instrument ID, operator identity, timestamp, and environmental conditions — structured for your quality system export. Tamper-evident by design.

outcome 3

Prevent batch holds

When an OOS result occurs, trucision provides the instrument health history for the preceding 72 hours — the first thing an investigator needs and the thing that typically takes two days to reconstruct manually.

A moisture analyzer failure at a critical control point isn't a lab problem — it's a production stop.

fda fsma • iso 22000 • haccp • sqf • brc global standards

Built for your whole team

bullet point

Moisture and water activity analyzers

bullet point

Near-infrared (NIR) analyzers

bullet point

Texture analyzers and rheometers

bullet point

pH meters and titrators

bullet point

Checkweighers and X-ray inspection systems

bullet point

Environmental monitoring sensors

Biggest risks without monitoring

bullet point

Instrument failure at a HACCP critical control point — line stop, potential product hold or recall risk

bullet point

Calibration drift in moisture or NIR analyzers — incorrect QC results — shelf-life or food safety risk

bullet point

Manual calibration logs fail FSMA supplier verification audit — corrective action required, audit finding on record

bullet point

Emergency service call during peak season — 2–5 day wait for a field technician

Blue illustration of scientific equipment including DNA model, microscope, pills, test tubes, flask, and chemical tank.

outcome 1

Prevent batch holds

Drift and threshold alerts notify your QA team before instruments go out of spec — not after a failed QC sample identifies the problem.

outcome 2

Audit-ready electronic records

Every instrument event generates a traceable record: instrument ID, operator identity, timestamp, and environmental conditions — structured for your quality system export. Tamper-evident by design.

outcome 3

Prevent batch holds

When an OOS result occurs, trucision provides the instrument health history for the preceding 72 hours — the first thing an investigator needs and the thing that typically takes two days to reconstruct manually.

ISO 17025 accreditation audits don't care that your icp-ms had a bad day. your qc data does.

iso 17025 • a2la accreditation • nelap / tni standard • nelap / tni standard

Built for your whole team

bullet point

ICP-MS and ICP-OES systems

bullet point

GC/MS and GC-FID systems

bullet point

TOC analyzers

bullet point

Ion chromatographs

bullet point

Atomic absorption spectrometers

bullet point

Flow injection analyzers

Biggest risks without monitoring

bullet point

Instrument drift between QC sample runs — client sample results affected before drift is formally detected

bullet point

Accreditation renewal: manually maintained equipment logs — auditor findings, potential scope reduction

bullet point

Turnaround time pressure: instrument downtime during hold-time sample window — sample invalidation

bullet point

Matrix interference or detector degradation between calibration cycles — not caught until QC fails

Blue-toned illustration of DNA model, microscope, medicine bottle, capsules, test tubes, flask, and lab equipment.
outcome 1

Prevent batch holds

Drift and threshold alerts notify your QA team before instruments go out of spec — not after a failed QC sample identifies the problem.

outcome 2

Audit-ready electronic records

Every instrument event generates a traceable record: instrument ID, operator identity, timestamp, and environmental conditions — structured for your quality system export. Tamper-evident by design.

outcome 3

Prevent batch holds

When an OOS result occurs, trucision provides the instrument health history for the preceding 72 hours — the first thing an investigator needs and the thing that typically takes two days to reconstruct manually.

When your process GC goes down in a refinery, you can't always get a field technician there within the same week.

OSHA PSM • API Standards • ATEX / IECEx • ISO 9001 / ISO/IEC 80079

Built for your whole team

bullet point

Process gas chromatographs (process GC)

bullet point

Viscometers and rheometers

bullet point

Karl Fischer water content analyzers

bullet point

Flash point and distillation testers

bullet point

Online and at-line NIR and Raman analyzers

bullet point

ATEX-rated process analyzers in classified areas

Biggest risks without monitoring

bullet point

Process GC downtime in a refinery — quality decisions made without analytical data — process safety risk or specification failure at product transfer

bullet point

ATEX instrument failure in a hazardous classified area — field service entry requires confined-space protocols — days of delay before diagnosis

bullet point

Fixed PM schedule misses actual degradation — instrument fails between planned maintenance visits

bullet point

Without remote pre-diagnosis data, dispatch occurs without confirmed root cause — increasing second-visit rates and the time before the right part is on site

Blue-toned illustration of scientific equipment including DNA model, microscope, pills, test tubes, flask, and reactor.

outcome 1

Prevent batch holds

Drift and threshold alerts notify your QA team before instruments go out of spec — not after a failed QC sample identifies the problem.

outcome 2

Audit-ready electronic records

Every instrument event generates a traceable record: instrument ID, operator identity, timestamp, and environmental conditions — structured for your quality system export. Tamper-evident by design.

outcome 3

Prevent batch holds

When an OOS result occurs, trucision provides the instrument health history for the preceding 72 hours — the first thing an investigator needs and the thing that typically takes two days to reconstruct manually.

Your clients audit your instruments. You need to be ready before they schedule the visit.

GLP (21 CFR Part 58) • ISO 17025 • OECD GLP • Sponsor-specific SOPs

Built for your whole team

bullet point

Multi-vendor analytical fleets (HPLC, GC, LC/MS, ICP) across mixed generations and data formats

bullet point

Stability chambers and environmental monitoring systems

bullet point

Dissolution and disintegration testers

bullet point

Spectrophotometers (UV/Vis, FTIR, Raman)

bullet point

Online and at-line NIR and Raman analyzers

Biggest risks without monitoring

bullet point

Sponsor audit finds instrument qualification gap — study data challenged — repeat testing cost and client relationship damage

bullet point

Multi-OEM fleet: each vendor's data format and service portal — no unified instrument health view across the lab

bullet point

Instrument failure during a GLP study — study integrity question — sponsor notification required under GLP regulations

bullet point

Utilization imbalance: some instruments chronically overloaded, others underused — billing inefficiency and accelerated wear

Blue-toned scientific illustration showing DNA model, microscope, pill bottle, test tubes, flask, and lab equipment.

outcome 1

Prevent batch holds

Drift and threshold alerts notify your QA team before instruments go out of spec — not after a failed QC sample identifies the problem.

outcome 2

Audit-ready electronic records

Every instrument event generates a traceable record: instrument ID, operator identity, timestamp, and environmental conditions — structured for your quality system export. Tamper-evident by design.

outcome 3

Prevent batch holds

When an OOS result occurs, trucision provides the instrument health history for the preceding 72 hours — the first thing an investigator needs and the thing that typically takes two days to reconstruct manually.

platform capabilities

Capture once at the instrument. Review and release in your quality system.

Ranges below reflect outcomes reported by lab operators and modeled across instrument portfolios in production use. Individual results depend on fleet size, instrument type, and current maintenance practice.

Instrument Health Monitoring — Every Device, One View

See the operational state of every connected instrument in real time — cycle counts, error codes, environmental readings, and health scores. Know before your team does when something is about to go wrong.

Drift and threshold alerts — Before you go out of spec

Trucision models calibration drift from real usage data, not fixed-interval schedules. Your QA team receives an alert 48–72 hours before an instrument crosses a compliance threshold — not after a failed QC sample triggers the investigation.

Automated Compliance Documentation

Every instrument event generates a structured record — timestamped, operator-attributed, and sensor-anchored. When an auditor asks for instrument history on a specific batch date, you pull a dashboard filter, not a binder.

Remote Diagnostics — Share context before dispatch

When an instrument alerts, your service team sees the same telemetry you do — reducing back-and-forth before the right technician arrives with the right parts.

better together

The instruments you have. The service operation you rely on. Both get smarter.

Trucision doesn't replace your instruments or your OEM service relationship. It gives both sides the same real-time diagnostic picture — so when something needs attention, everyone already knows what it is.

For your lab

The instruments you've already purchased, qualified, and validated — HPLC systems, GCs, dissolution testers, process analyzers — don't need to be replaced or upgraded. Trucision's lightweight edge agent connects to what you have, reading instrument health data without modifying anything your QA team has validated.

bullet point

Works on instruments purchased 3, 5, or 10 years ago

bullet point

No firmware changes, no hardware modification, no re-qualification trigger

bullet point

Connects to your existing LIMS and data infrastructure — no parallel system to maintain-based maintenance scheduling replaces fixed-interval guesswork

instrument health timeline
instrument health timeline

For your service team

When your instrument alerts, your service contact sees the same diagnostic data you do — in real time. That means when a technician is dispatched, they arrive with a confirmed diagnosis, the right parts, and a resolution plan. Fewer second visits. Faster resolution. A service relationship that works the way it was supposed to.

bullet point

Shared diagnostic dashboard — your team and your service contact, same data

bullet point

Service calls start with shared telemetry summary before dispatch, not a symptom description alone

bullet point

Service calls start with shared telemetry summary before dispatch, not a symptom description alone

data integrity & compliance

Data integrity isn't a feature. It's the foundation.

ALCOA+ means every data point must be Attributable, Legible, Contemporaneous, Original, and Accurate. Trucision structures records at the instrument layer — giving your QA team the provenance they need when a question arises.

Chain of Custody

From Instrument to Audit Trail

Every measurement carries its provenance: instrument serial number, calibration state at time of reading, operator ID, environmental conditions, and a structured timestamp — for export and review in your quality system.

Electronic Records

21 cfr part 11 and eu annex 11 ready

Electronic records are generated at the source, not transcribed from paper logs. Electronic signatures are linked to authentic user identities. Audit trails are system- generated and cannot be modified - meeting FDA and EU GMP requirements for computerized systems in regulated environments.

Corrective Action

Deviation context, prepared for review

When a deviation occurs, Trucision prepares a structured context package: the triggering event, instrument sensor history for the preceding window, operator actions, and relevant calibration state — for your quality team to review, supplement, and sign off in your quality system.

21 CFR PART 11ISO 13485EU ANNEXSOC 2 TYPE IIGDPR
21 CFRISO 13485EU ANNEXSOC 2GDPR
From kickoff to recurring revenue

Six steps. Two weeks to first dashboard. No firmware rewrite.

An integration playbook designed for OEM engineering and service teams - not a SaaS rip-and - replace.

LineLineLine

STEP 01

Assess

We review your instrument list, OS environments, and network architecture. We identify which instruments are connectable today and whether any require a gateway device. No site visit required for the initial scoping — this happens remotely.

STEP 02

Connect

Structured telemetry flows securely overMQTT or REST with TLS encryption-including in air-gapped or low-connectivity environments. Un-device buffering ensuresno data loss during network interruptions.

Key point

No re-validation of the instrument itself. The agent observes; it does not modify your validated state.

LineLineLine

STEP 03

Configure

Data flows into your existing LIMS, ELN, orYour instrument's data schema is mapped, telemetry flows into the dashboard, and alert thresholds are set based on your QA team's specifications. First predictive health dashboard is live within two weeks of kickoff.

STEP 04

Monitor

Your team has continuous visibility. Your QA lead gets structured compliance documentation ready for review. Your service contact gets telemetry context when something alerts. The system learns your instrument's operational baseline over time.

LineLineLine
STEP 01
Assess
We review your instrument list, OS environments, and network architecture. We identify which instruments are connectable today and whether any require a gateway device. No site visit required for the initial scoping — this happens remotely.
STEP 02
Connect
Structured telemetry flows securely overMQTT or REST with TLS encryption-including in air-gapped or low-connectivity environments. Un-device buffering ensuresno data loss during network interruptions.
Key point
No re-validation of the instrument itself. The agent observes; it does not modify your validated state.
STEP 03
Configure
Data flows into your existing LIMS, ELN, orYour instrument's data schema is mapped, telemetry flows into the dashboard, and alert thresholds are set based on your QA team's specifications. First predictive health dashboard is live within two weeks of kickoff.
STEP 04
Monitor
Your team has continuous visibility.
Your QA lead gets compliance documentation automatically. Your service contact gets remote diagnostic access when something
alerts. The system runs — and gets more accurate as it learns your specific instrument's operational baseline.

from the field

Operators speaking from inside their labs.

This is going to do wonders for their service technicians. Instead of guessing, they can use this platform, see the key diagnostics explained by evidence from full error history, and immediately understand what's going on.

- Lab Manager
US Lab Network

“From an executive point of view, I’m excited about what I’m seeing in our platform. It gives us a way to look at utilization, rework, and outsourcing costs across our network, not just a single lab. Every dollar we save in efficiency has a 5–6× impact on revenue, so anything that reduces rework, prevents downtime, and cuts inter‑lab shipping directly improves our P&L.”

- SVP Procurement,
US Lab Network

Get started

Your instruments are generating health signals right now. You just can't see them yet.

We'll show you what your instrument data looks like in a Trucision dashboard — using telemetry patterns from instruments like yours. No commitment. One hour.

Name *

Company

Email *

Role

What are you working on ? *

We will contact you soon!

Please complete all mandatory fields before submitting.